All papers published in Economic Policy: Papers on European and Global Issues are commissioned by the Managing Editor. The journal does not accept unsolicited submissions.
These FAQs provide practical guidance for commissioned authors on the editorial, conference, and publication process.
1. How are papers selected for publication?
All papers published in Economic Policy: Papers on European and Global Issues are commissioned by the Managing Editor. The journal does not accept unsolicited submissions. Invitations are extended to scholars whose expertise and ongoing research align closely with the journal’s thematic priorities and editorial direction.
2. What is the timeline for submitting a commissioned article?
Authors are typically given 8–12 weeks to prepare a first draft following their invitation. The exact deadline will be confirmed in the commissioning contract. Extensions may be considered in exceptional circumstances, but must be agreed in advance.
3. What does the review process involve?
Commissioned papers undergo a distinctive review process that balances academic rigour with policy relevance. Each submission is reviewed by members of the Managing Editor and external referees. Following peer review, authors are invited to present their working draft at one of the journal’s biannual conferences—held in summer and winter—for further feedback and discussion.
4. Are there any embargo or confidentiality policies?
Yes. All commissioned papers are embargoed until their presentation at the relevant conference. Authors should not circulate, publish, or post working drafts publicly prior to this point. This ensures that the journal’s editorial and peer review process can proceed with integrity and that the content remains novel at the time of public discussion.
5. What is expected at the conference stage?
Authors are expected to present their draft at one of the journal’s biannual conferences. Each paper is discussed by two invited discussants who provide detailed feedback from both academic and policy-making perspectives. Authors are required to revise their paper based on the referee reports and conference discussions. The Managing Editor provides guidance during this stage to ensure that revisions enhance clarity, accessibility, and impact.
6. What is the typical timeline for publication?
Final versions of papers—along with the written contributions from discussants—are published within six months of the paper’s presentation at the conference.
Authors will receive proofs for correction prior to publication. Only typographical or factual corrections can be made at this stage.
7. What are the style and formatting requirements?
Authors will be provided with a journal template and style guide upon commissioning. Please ensure that:
- All figures include alternative (alt) text to support accessibility for readers using screen readers. Alt text should briefly describe the figure’s content and purpose.
- References are complete, accurate, and consistently formatted.
- Permissions have been secured for all third-party material (including tables, figures, and datasets).
8. What are the journal’s expectations for data availability?
Authors are expected to make underlying data and code publicly available wherever possible to promote transparency and replication. Supplementary materials may be published alongside the article or made accessible online.
9. What are the licensing requirements?
Upon acceptance, authors are required to complete an online licence to publish form with Oxford University Press. They may choose either the standard licence or, if eligible, an open access licence supported by their funder or institution.
10. Who do I contact for questions during the writing or review process?
Your primary point of contact is the Managing Editor or the editorial contact specified in your commissioning correspondence. For general queries about process or policy, please write to:
Editorial Office
✉️ ep.pegi@economic-policy.org
